- #Raedon r9 380 vr supported drivers#
- #Raedon r9 380 vr supported driver#
- #Raedon r9 380 vr supported windows 10#
- #Raedon r9 380 vr supported software#
- #Raedon r9 380 vr supported windows#
#Raedon r9 380 vr supported driver#
Having to have customers take such steps to achieve original performance is ludicrous in any case and poor Quality management from a modern You wish! A decrease in driver performance only after 1.5years and you call me spoiled!? Some illogical reasoning you have my friend.įurthermore, you are still misinterpreting my response to you, I do not have a R9 series card although I had one a few years ago, so I am not expecting a decade of support, like I have said more than once my card is still in support and I expect AMD's mistake to be fixed for all affected cards which seems to be everything pre-navi, since I have seen people on the recent Vega complain about the issue as well. DLL's into the affected application(s) folder is also mostly ineffective, since the WDDM versions of the DLL's have to be the same as the installed driver. What most logical deductions would deduce is for driver stability to stay 95% on PAR with what it was in the same applications on release.įurthermore, pasting the older driver.
#Raedon r9 380 vr supported software#
I agree with the card functioning properly on release and no it is not a courtesy to expect previous applications to keep performing at least 95% on PAR with what they used to although I agree future optimizations for new software is a courtesy and I did not state that future optimizations for future software is an obligation indefinitely, that is something you did not deduce from my comment but from your own interpretation.
#Raedon r9 380 vr supported windows#
Therefore, it is much too tedious to keep older/different versions of the driver working this is not Linux after all where Proton manages this better, this is Windows where it is required/expected to have one stable up-to-date driver.
#Raedon r9 380 vr supported windows 10#
In addition, Windows 10 automatically removes the driver if it is older than the minimum included version of the current build.
#Raedon r9 380 vr supported drivers#
As you update to newer builds/service packs of Windows 10, previous drivers become noticeably more unstable and create artefacts in software like web browsers.
Furthermore, a product in fact stays relevant as long as driver updates are being released for it which is thankfully my case and why I am complaining about driver issues whilst it can still be fixed, and no it is not the fact that they are still pumping major money into it, but rather allocating resources to fixing it which is quite often mostly backwards compatible with a big line of their hardware (this is the reason why there is also a modded driver available since it is still compatible with older you for your response, although reverting to a previous driver was most of our logical deductions as well, this is frustratingly not the case. If you are glad to keep throwing money at new hardware every year then do it, it is a really expensive and unaffordable way to live, but if you are rolling in money then go with it. I do not know how you think you will keep customers if your clients products decreased in performance with the release of newer drivers in select applications it used to do absolutely fine with. " So what are you asking for? Not for them to fix something, but to give you more features that they never claimed you'd get." Putting words to my sentence that I did not state at all, in fact I was explaining that they should fix issues that they introduce shortly after releasing a product and not at all about including features that the card was not released with.Ĭomprehend what you read in addition, it is absolutely expected good business if the software for a product keeps performing at least as good as when the original software for the hardware was released. I did not state that they are obliged to provide new features for older cards anywhere in my last comment, I wrote that they should focus on quality assurance of ensuring they do not break performance/features (which they do quite frequently) for recent cards on which it was working correctly.įurthermore, I said nothing about indefinite support, only about quality assurance. You absolutely interpreted what I wrote wrong.
0 kommentar(er)
